Keywords:
special circumstances . means test .

  • 12 Cases on This Topic
  • Cases for Zip
  • All Cases By Date
  • Cases A - Z

Cases for Zip , California Northern District Bankruptcy Court

Ninth Circuit Cases

• In re Tuss

Bankr.D.Mont. - 360 B.R. 684 - 2007-01-05 - ,

Google ID#: 13363629229501653555
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

In trying to encapsulate the "special circumstances" rule in a shorthand word or phrase, courts have utilized various concepts. Here: "Beyond the reasonable control of the debtor".

Other Circuits

• In re Cotto

Bankr. E.D.N.Y. - 425 BR 72 - 2010-03-12 - 7 ,

Google ID#: 13745372797749003398
(Type B : Item is not a special circumstance )

"The Court cannot conclude that Congress intended the 'special circumstances' exception to strict application of the means test to undermine the unambiguous definition of CMI. Section 101(10A) sets forth specific enumerated exceptions to categories of income that must be included in CMI. A non-recurring, one-time only payment is not one of those exceptions."

• In re Witek

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - 383 B.R. 323 - 2007-11-29 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 9315258897460874742
(Type : )

• In re Lightsey

Bankr.S.D.Ga. - 374 B.R. 377 - 2007-07-26 - 7 , Above

Google ID#: 5418864583280234931
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

• In re Johns

Bankr.E.D.Okla. - 342 B.R. 626 - 2007-05-26 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 16666959044257069897
(Type B : Item is not a special circumstance )

A de minimus or zero percent dividend in a hypothetical Chapter 13 is not a special circumstance.

• In re Armstrong

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - 2007 WL 1544591 - 2007-05-24 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#:
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

• In re Delbecq

Bankr.S.D.Ind. - 368 B.R. 754 - 2007-04-26 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 523295057218656622
(Type : )

Special circumstances creating strain on the debtor's budget must be outside of the debtor's control.

• In re Haman

Bankr.D.Del. - 366 B.R. 307 - 2007-04-20 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#:
(Type : )

The special circumstances must justify an additional expense or an adjustment to income sufficient to rebut the presumption of abuse.

• In re Sparks

Bankr.E.D.Tex. - 360 B.R. 224 - 2006-10-18 - 13 , Above

Google ID#: 11839803688355495777
(Type : )

An unusually high transportation expense is not a special circumstance.

• In re Sparks

Bankr.E.D.Tex. - 360 B.R. 224 - 2006-10-18 - ,

Google ID#: 11839803688355495777
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

In trying to encapsulate the "special circumstances" rule in a shorthand word or phrase, courts have utilized various concepts. Here: "Unanticipated" and "Truly unavoidable"

• In re Batzkiel

Bankr.N.D.Iowa - 349 B.R. 581 - 2006-08-07 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 1936233606441025869
(Type : )

An unusually high transportation expense is a special circumstance.

• In re Crego

Bankr.E.D.Wis. - 387 B.R. 225 - - 13 ,

Google ID#: 12899813557101600952
(Type A : Item is a special circumstance )

Joint debtors who maintain separate households is a special circumstance.

• In re Cotto

Bankr. E.D.N.Y. - 425 BR 72 - 2010-03-12 - 7 ,

Google ID#: 13745372797749003398
(Type B : Item is not a special circumstance )

"The Court cannot conclude that Congress intended the 'special circumstances' exception to strict application of the means test to undermine the unambiguous definition of CMI. Section 101(10A) sets forth specific enumerated exceptions to categories of income that must be included in CMI. A non-recurring, one-time only payment is not one of those exceptions."

• In re Witek

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - 383 B.R. 323 - 2007-11-29 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 9315258897460874742
(Type : )

• In re Lightsey

Bankr.S.D.Ga. - 374 B.R. 377 - 2007-07-26 - 7 , Above

Google ID#: 5418864583280234931
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

• In re Johns

Bankr.E.D.Okla. - 342 B.R. 626 - 2007-05-26 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 16666959044257069897
(Type B : Item is not a special circumstance )

A de minimus or zero percent dividend in a hypothetical Chapter 13 is not a special circumstance.

• In re Armstrong

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - 2007 WL 1544591 - 2007-05-24 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#:
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

• In re Delbecq

Bankr.S.D.Ind. - 368 B.R. 754 - 2007-04-26 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 523295057218656622
(Type : )

Special circumstances creating strain on the debtor's budget must be outside of the debtor's control.

• In re Haman

Bankr.D.Del. - 366 B.R. 307 - 2007-04-20 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#:
(Type : )

The special circumstances must justify an additional expense or an adjustment to income sufficient to rebut the presumption of abuse.

• In re Tuss

Bankr.D.Mont. - 360 B.R. 684 - 2007-01-05 - ,

Google ID#: 13363629229501653555
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

In trying to encapsulate the "special circumstances" rule in a shorthand word or phrase, courts have utilized various concepts. Here: "Beyond the reasonable control of the debtor".

• In re Sparks

Bankr.E.D.Tex. - 360 B.R. 224 - 2006-10-18 - 13 , Above

Google ID#: 11839803688355495777
(Type : )

An unusually high transportation expense is not a special circumstance.

• In re Sparks

Bankr.E.D.Tex. - 360 B.R. 224 - 2006-10-18 - ,

Google ID#: 11839803688355495777
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

In trying to encapsulate the "special circumstances" rule in a shorthand word or phrase, courts have utilized various concepts. Here: "Unanticipated" and "Truly unavoidable"

• In re Batzkiel

Bankr.N.D.Iowa - 349 B.R. 581 - 2006-08-07 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 1936233606441025869
(Type : )

An unusually high transportation expense is a special circumstance.

• In re Crego

Bankr.E.D.Wis. - 387 B.R. 225 - - 13 ,

Google ID#: 12899813557101600952
(Type A : Item is a special circumstance )

Joint debtors who maintain separate households is a special circumstance.

All Cases A to Z

  • In re Armstrong, 2007 WL 1544591 , (Bankr.N.D.Ohio ) 2007-05-24, #
  • In re Batzkiel, 349 B.R. 581 , (Bankr.N.D.Iowa ) 2006-08-07, #1936233606441025869
  • In re Cotto, 425 BR 72 , (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. ) 2010-03-12, #13745372797749003398
  • In re Crego, 387 B.R. 225 , (Bankr.E.D.Wis. ) , #12899813557101600952
  • In re Delbecq, 368 B.R. 754 , (Bankr.S.D.Ind. ) 2007-04-26, #523295057218656622
  • In re Haman, 366 B.R. 307 , (Bankr.D.Del. ) 2007-04-20, #
  • In re Johns, 342 B.R. 626 , (Bankr.E.D.Okla. ) 2007-05-26, #16666959044257069897
  • In re Lightsey, 374 B.R. 377 , (Bankr.S.D.Ga. ) 2007-07-26, #5418864583280234931
  • In re Sparks, 360 B.R. 224 , (Bankr.E.D.Tex. ) 2006-10-18, #11839803688355495777
  • In re Sparks, 360 B.R. 224 , (Bankr.E.D.Tex. ) 2006-10-18, #11839803688355495777
  • In re Tuss, 360 B.R. 684 , (Bankr.D.Mont. ) 2007-01-05, #13363629229501653555
  • In re Witek, 383 B.R. 323 , (Bankr.N.D.Ohio ) 2007-11-29, #9315258897460874742