LegalConsumer.com Bankruptcy Research Notes - Beta 0.08 - (1300+ cases & articles, and counting...)

Topics:

Keywords: special circumstances . means test .

Topic #57:: Special Circumstances: Miscellaneous Cases

  • Topic Overview
  • 12 Cases on This Topic
  • ?

Means Test > Special Circumstances >

Special Circumstances: Miscellaneous Cases

12 Cases , IssueID 57

Ch 7 Means Test
Form 22A, Line 52
Ch 13 Means Test
Form 22C Line

Topic Description:

If you fail the means test, but feel there are circumstances that make the means test an inaccurate representation of your ability to pay your creditors, you can make a claim of "special circumstances" to explain to the trustee and the judge why you feel you should be allowed to proceed with a Chapter 7 even though your means test numbers show a presumption of abuse.

Note also that the trustee has the discretion to decline to file a motion to dismiss, even if you fail the means test, and does so frequently. The key, in either case, is to disclose as much information and documentation as possible to explain why the means test presumption of abuse is wrong in a particular case, and does not accurately reflect your ability to pay. In short: Disclose, disclose, disclose.

"A debtor seeking to establish "special circumstances" under §707(b)(2)(B) must satisfy both procedural and substantive requirements. The procedural requirements

are set forth in § 707(b)(2)(B)(ii), (iii), and (iv), and they require a debtor (1) to "itemize" each additional expense or income adjustment by setting forth the nature of the suggested adjustment, its amount, and its impact on the debtor's finances and the means test calculation; (2) to provide "documentation" of the additional expense or income adjustment; (3) to provide a "detailed explanation" of the "special circumstances" that make the additional expense or income adjustment "necessary and reasonable;" and (4) to "attest under oath" to the accuracy of the information the debtor provides.

In re Pageau, 383 B.R. 221, 225 (Bankr. D.N.H. 2008) (citing Littman, 370 B.R. at 830); Haman, 366 B.R. 307, 312 (Bankr. D. Del. 2007). "
- In re Harmon, Bky. No. 10-15329 ELF, (Bankr, ED Pa., 2011)

Lines of Cases:

A:

Item is a special circumstance

B::

Item is not a special circumstance

C:

Definitions/ descriptions

  • Type A = Item is a special circumstance
  • Type B = Item is not a special circumstance
  • Type C = Definitions/ descriptions
  • Type E = "Everything Else"
  • Cases for Zip
  • All Cases By Date
  • Cases A - Z

Cases for Zip , California Northern District Bankruptcy Court

Ninth Circuit Cases

� In re Tuss

Bankr.D.Mont. - 360 B.R. 684 - 2007-01-05 - ,

Google ID#: 13363629229501653555
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

In trying to encapsulate the "special circumstances" rule in a shorthand word or phrase, courts have utilized various concepts. Here: "Beyond the reasonable control of the debtor".

Other Circuits

� In re Cotto

Bankr. E.D.N.Y. - 425 BR 72 - 2010-03-12 - 7 ,

Google ID#: 13745372797749003398
(Type B : Item is not a special circumstance )

"The Court cannot conclude that Congress intended the 'special circumstances' exception to strict application of the means test to undermine the unambiguous definition of CMI. Section 101(10A) sets forth specific enumerated exceptions to categories of income that must be included in CMI. A non-recurring, one-time only payment is not one of those exceptions."

� In re Witek

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - 383 B.R. 323 - 2007-11-29 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 9315258897460874742
(Type : )

� In re Lightsey

Bankr.S.D.Ga. - 374 B.R. 377 - 2007-07-26 - 7 , Above

Google ID#: 5418864583280234931
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

� In re Johns

Bankr.E.D.Okla. - 342 B.R. 626 - 2007-05-26 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 16666959044257069897
(Type B : Item is not a special circumstance )

A de minimus or zero percent dividend in a hypothetical Chapter 13 is not a special circumstance.

� In re Armstrong

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - 2007 WL 1544591 - 2007-05-24 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#:
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

� In re Delbecq

Bankr.S.D.Ind. - 368 B.R. 754 - 2007-04-26 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 523295057218656622
(Type : )

Special circumstances creating strain on the debtor's budget must be outside of the debtor's control.

� In re Haman

Bankr.D.Del. - 366 B.R. 307 - 2007-04-20 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#:
(Type : )

The special circumstances must justify an additional expense or an adjustment to income sufficient to rebut the presumption of abuse.

� In re Sparks

Bankr.E.D.Tex. - 360 B.R. 224 - 2006-10-18 - 13 , Above

Google ID#: 11839803688355495777
(Type : )

An unusually high transportation expense is not a special circumstance.

� In re Sparks

Bankr.E.D.Tex. - 360 B.R. 224 - 2006-10-18 - ,

Google ID#: 11839803688355495777
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

In trying to encapsulate the "special circumstances" rule in a shorthand word or phrase, courts have utilized various concepts. Here: "Unanticipated" and "Truly unavoidable"

� In re Batzkiel

Bankr.N.D.Iowa - 349 B.R. 581 - 2006-08-07 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 1936233606441025869
(Type : )

An unusually high transportation expense is a special circumstance.

� In re Crego

Bankr.E.D.Wis. - 387 B.R. 225 - - 13 ,

Google ID#: 12899813557101600952
(Type A : Item is a special circumstance )

Joint debtors who maintain separate households is a special circumstance.

� In re Cotto

Bankr. E.D.N.Y. - 425 BR 72 - 2010-03-12 - 7 ,

Google ID#: 13745372797749003398
(Type B : Item is not a special circumstance )

"The Court cannot conclude that Congress intended the 'special circumstances' exception to strict application of the means test to undermine the unambiguous definition of CMI. Section 101(10A) sets forth specific enumerated exceptions to categories of income that must be included in CMI. A non-recurring, one-time only payment is not one of those exceptions."

� In re Witek

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - 383 B.R. 323 - 2007-11-29 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 9315258897460874742
(Type : )

� In re Lightsey

Bankr.S.D.Ga. - 374 B.R. 377 - 2007-07-26 - 7 , Above

Google ID#: 5418864583280234931
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

� In re Johns

Bankr.E.D.Okla. - 342 B.R. 626 - 2007-05-26 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 16666959044257069897
(Type B : Item is not a special circumstance )

A de minimus or zero percent dividend in a hypothetical Chapter 13 is not a special circumstance.

� In re Armstrong

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - 2007 WL 1544591 - 2007-05-24 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#:
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

� In re Delbecq

Bankr.S.D.Ind. - 368 B.R. 754 - 2007-04-26 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 523295057218656622
(Type : )

Special circumstances creating strain on the debtor's budget must be outside of the debtor's control.

� In re Haman

Bankr.D.Del. - 366 B.R. 307 - 2007-04-20 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#:
(Type : )

The special circumstances must justify an additional expense or an adjustment to income sufficient to rebut the presumption of abuse.

� In re Tuss

Bankr.D.Mont. - 360 B.R. 684 - 2007-01-05 - ,

Google ID#: 13363629229501653555
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

In trying to encapsulate the "special circumstances" rule in a shorthand word or phrase, courts have utilized various concepts. Here: "Beyond the reasonable control of the debtor".

� In re Sparks

Bankr.E.D.Tex. - 360 B.R. 224 - 2006-10-18 - 13 , Above

Google ID#: 11839803688355495777
(Type : )

An unusually high transportation expense is not a special circumstance.

� In re Sparks

Bankr.E.D.Tex. - 360 B.R. 224 - 2006-10-18 - ,

Google ID#: 11839803688355495777
(Type C : Definitions/ descriptions )

In trying to encapsulate the "special circumstances" rule in a shorthand word or phrase, courts have utilized various concepts. Here: "Unanticipated" and "Truly unavoidable"

� In re Batzkiel

Bankr.N.D.Iowa - 349 B.R. 581 - 2006-08-07 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 1936233606441025869
(Type : )

An unusually high transportation expense is a special circumstance.

� In re Crego

Bankr.E.D.Wis. - 387 B.R. 225 - - 13 ,

Google ID#: 12899813557101600952
(Type A : Item is a special circumstance )

Joint debtors who maintain separate households is a special circumstance.

All Cases A to Z

  • In re Armstrong, 2007 WL 1544591 , (Bankr.N.D.Ohio ) 2007-05-24, #
  • In re Batzkiel, 349 B.R. 581 , (Bankr.N.D.Iowa ) 2006-08-07, #1936233606441025869
  • In re Cotto, 425 BR 72 , (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. ) 2010-03-12, #13745372797749003398
  • In re Crego, 387 B.R. 225 , (Bankr.E.D.Wis. ) , #12899813557101600952
  • In re Delbecq, 368 B.R. 754 , (Bankr.S.D.Ind. ) 2007-04-26, #523295057218656622
  • In re Haman, 366 B.R. 307 , (Bankr.D.Del. ) 2007-04-20, #
  • In re Johns, 342 B.R. 626 , (Bankr.E.D.Okla. ) 2007-05-26, #16666959044257069897
  • In re Lightsey, 374 B.R. 377 , (Bankr.S.D.Ga. ) 2007-07-26, #5418864583280234931
  • In re Sparks, 360 B.R. 224 , (Bankr.E.D.Tex. ) 2006-10-18, #11839803688355495777
  • In re Sparks, 360 B.R. 224 , (Bankr.E.D.Tex. ) 2006-10-18, #11839803688355495777
  • In re Tuss, 360 B.R. 684 , (Bankr.D.Mont. ) 2007-01-05, #13363629229501653555
  • In re Witek, 383 B.R. 323 , (Bankr.N.D.Ohio ) 2007-11-29, #9315258897460874742

FAQ/Help:

How to use case law (it can be tricky)

If you're not familiar with what "case law" is, and how to use it, check out Chapter 7 of Nolo's LegalResearch: How to Find and Understand the Law for a guide to how to read through a case to get the parts that matter.

Also, you need to be familiar with the concept of "jurisdiction." Here are some helpful links:

When you read a case, check to make sure that the case's decision applies to your local district. Do this by looking at which court has decided the case -- either the U.S. Supreme Court, a court of appeal (listed here in large type), or a district court (listed in small type).  Your local district court judge is not bound to follow the opinion of judges from other district courts, but often they look to these cases for advice. Your local district, however, is bound  to follow decisions in cases from it governing circuit court. You'll see fairly few Supreme Court case here, but those cases are also binding on all districts."

Are these all the bankruptcy cases there are?

NO! NO! NO! This is a start for your research. New cases are constantly being decided. I update this when I have time. This is only a fraction of the actual published opinions out there. Dozens of cases are handed down nationwide every week. I catalog interesting ones when I have time. They are meant to serve as a starting point for your research -- NOT as a comprehensive listing of the current state of the law.

 

DISCLAIMER. By using this database you acknowledge and agree to the following:

This database does not contain every relevant case in every district on the topics covered; there are high priced services for that. This is free. It is offered to the public "as is" as an adjunct to the Nolo books, How to File Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: Keep Your Property and Repay Your Debts Over Time (10th Edition, 2010): which I co-author with attorney Stephen Elias.

This database is updated as time permits. Do not assume that it has the latest case in your district. We are still filling holes in the database -- and will always be. Use it as a place to start your reasearch, rather than the final answer to your question.

Some of these issues involve the discretion of the judge which can vary from judge to judge. So, even if you find a case just like yours where a judge went your way, as they say in the car biz, "your mileage may vary..."

If you're not familiar with what "case law" is, and how to use it, check out Chapter 7 of Nolo's LegalResearch: How to Find and Understand the Law for a guide to how to read through a case to get the parts that matter.

For more help, click the "?" tab.