LegalConsumer.com Bankruptcy Research Notes - Beta 0.08 - (1300+ cases & articles, and counting...)

Topics:

Keywords: means test . expenses . special circumstances .

Topic #4:: Expenses: 401(k) loan repayment allowed in Chapter 13 but not in Chapter 7: b/c not a "mandatory payroll deduction" or "special circumstance" or " debt"

  • Selected Case
  • Topic Overview
  • 26 Cases on This Topic
  • ?

Case Summary In re Phillips, 417 B.R. 30, S.D. Ohio, 9/22/2009, 7, Above

In re Phillips, 417 B.R. 30 (S.D. Ohio 2009)

Topics

Means Test > Expenses > Mandatory Payroll Deduction > 401(k) loan repayment deduction

Expenses: 401(k) loan repayment allowed in Chapter 13 but not in Chapter 7: b/c not a "mandatory payroll deduction" or "special circumstance" or " debt"

26 Cases , IssueID 4

Ch 7 Means Test
Form 22A, Line 26
Ch 13 Means Test
Form 22C Line 31

Topic Description:

Chapter 7 Means test form is generally held not to allow deduction of 401(k) loans repayments anywhere on the form.

In a long line of cases, various debtors have tried various arguments, classifying the payments as as "secured debts" or as "necessary expenses"
In most cases, those attempts are rejected.

However, the fact that such expenses are deductible in Chapter 13, it is quite possible to have a scenario where forcing the debtor into Chapter 13 would result in no net benefit to unsecured creditors. In such cases, some judges have found it to be relevant among other special circumstances to override the presumption of abuse created by the Chapter 7 Means Test calculation on Form 22A.

Lines of Cases:

A:

Payroll deduction not allowed on Chapter 7 means test, even though they'd be allowed in Chapter 13

B::

Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors is not a "special circumstance" for Chapter 7 determination

C:

401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test

D:

Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors relevant to "totality of circumstances"

E:

"Everything else..."

Topic Background / Overview:

Chapter 13 didn't always allow 401(k) loan repayment deductions, but the 2005 law wrote this allowance into the Chapter 13 version of the means test, but NOT into the Chapter 7 version.

Some judges have decided to avoid the "absurd" result of forcing a debtor into a Chapter 13 even though unsecured creditors will get nothing, based on the new Chapter 13 formula for "disposable income" used in Chapter 13, under the 2005 law.

  • Type A = Payroll deduction not allowed on Chapter 7 means test, even though they'd be allowed in Chapter 13
  • Type B = Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors is not a "special circumstance" for Chapter 7 determination
  • Type C = 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test
  • Type D = Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors relevant to "totality of circumstances"
  • Type E = "Everything Else"
  • Cases for Zip 84782
  • All Cases By Date
  • Cases A - Z

Cases for Zip 84782, Utah District Bankruptcy Court

Tenth Circuit Cases

� In re Salerno

Bankr.D.Colorado - 408 B.R. 558 - 2009-06-25 - 7 , NA

Google ID#: 3855918633145811105
(Type D : Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors relevant to "totality of circumstances" )

� In re Johns

Bankr.E.D.Okla. - 342 B.R. 626 - 2007-05-26 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 16666959044257069897
(Type B : Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors is not a "special circumstance" for Chapter 7 determination )

� In re Skvorecz

Bankr.D.Colo. - 369 B.R. 638 - 2007-05-11 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 341173194400983342
(Type D : Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors relevant to "totality of circumstances" )

Court can refuse motion to dismiss Chapter 7 despite abuse presumption to avoid "absurd result" where credtiors would get $0 under Chapter 13 because of 401k loan repayment.

Other Circuits

� In re Eagan

Bankr. E.D PA - 458 B.R. 836 - 2011-08-30 - 13 ,

Google ID#: 5843105455816483743
(Type E : )

Chapter 13 plan payments do not have to increase once 401Kk) loan is paid off. Here, debtors were allowed to increase 401Kk) contributions once the loan was paid off so there would be no net change in Chapter 13 payments. Court said that was OK under section 541(b)(7), Judge noted that form 22C and section 541(b)(7) excludes plan payments from a debor's projected disposable income.

� In re Harrison

M.D.N.C - Case No. 09-51072 - 2010-01-25 - 7 ,

Google ID#: 10819978508425423191
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

No Chapter 7 means test deduction for retirement loan repayment

� In re Phillips

S.D. Ohio - 417 B.R. 30 - 2009-09-22 - 7 , Above

Google ID#: 17197251073868773270
(Type D : Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors relevant to "totality of circumstances" )

� Egebjerg v. Anderson (U.S. Trustee) (In re Egebjerg)

9th Cir. - 574 F.3d 1045 - 2009-08-24 - ,

Google ID#: 7299850787958061596
(Type E : )

Repayments of 401(k) loans are not deducted when calculating a debtor's disposable income.

� Egebjerg v. Anderson (In re Egebjerg)

9th Cir. - 574 F.3d 1045 - 2009-08-03 - 7 ,

Google ID#: 15249378171152015010
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

� Nowlin v. Peake (Matter of Nowlin)

5th Cir. - 576 F.3d 258 - 2009-07-17 - 13 , Above

Google ID#: 3377077295689169928
(Type : )

Only "actual" amount of payments to be made over plan period can be deducted; court can require increased payments when loan is repaid

� Bolen v. Adams

N.D.Mississippi - 403 B.R. 396 - 2009-03-06 - 7 , Above

Google ID#: 18156836191608014424
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

� In re Christiansen

Bankr. M.D.N.C. - Case No. 08-50871 - 2009-01-21 - 7 ,

Google ID#: 5511081501211244408
(Type E : )

Debtor filed for Chapter 7 relief, but the court held that he could repay all of his unsecured debt under a 60 month Chapter 13 plan instead (by ceasing his contributions to his 401(k) retirement account).

� In re Mravik

Bankr. E.D. Wis. - 399 B.R. 202 - 2008-12-31 - 7 , Above

Google ID#: 9601931560099652766
(Type D : Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors relevant to "totality of circumstances" )

� In re Lipford

Bankr. M.D. N.C. - 397 BR 320 - 2008-10-17 - 13 , Above

Google ID#: 4506345063134156975
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

� In re Lasowski

BAP 8th Cir. - 384 BR 205 - 2008-03-31 - 13 , Above

Google ID#: 271615358476855156
(Type : )

only actual amount of plan payments to be made over plan period may be deducted.

� In re Mowris

Bankr.W.D. Missouri - 384 BR 235 - 2008-03-17 - 7 , Above

Google ID#: 5774741274676227177
(Type A : Payroll deduction not allowed on Chapter 7 means test, even though they'd be allowed in Chapter 13 )

� In re Felske

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - 385 B.R. 649 - 2008-02-06 - 7 ,

Google ID#: 9788658839424903022
(Type B : Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors is not a "special circumstance" for Chapter 7 determination )

� In re Mordis

Bankr.E.D.Mo. - 2007 WL 2962903 - 2007-10-09 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 271615358476855156
(Type A : Payroll deduction not allowed on Chapter 7 means test, even though they'd be allowed in Chapter 13 )

� In re Lewis

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - Case No. 07-32371 - 2007-09-17 - 7 , Above

Google ID#:
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

� In re Whitaker

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - 2007 WL 2156397 - 2007-07-25 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#:
(Type A : Payroll deduction not allowed on Chapter 7 means test, even though they'd be allowed in Chapter 13 )

� Eisen v. Thompson

N.D.Ohio - 370 B.R. 762 - 2007-06-29 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 8320374732301834089
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

� McVay v. Otero

W.D.Tex. - 371 B.R. 190 - 2007-04-26 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 13235503489676277826
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

401(k) loan repayments are neither debt nor secured debt and, therefore, are not an allowed expense deduction on Form 22A.

� In re Zaporski

Bankr.E.D.Mich. - 366 B.R. 758 - 2007-04-17 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 3225070862768722755
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

ability to pay off 401(k) loan is an indicator of 707(b)(3) abuse in light of "totality of circumstances" even though congress granted them extra protection under BAPCPA. Although excludable in Chapter 13, can still be relevant to a "totality of circumstances" abuse finding in Chapter 7

� In re Turner

Bankr.D.N.H. - 376 B.R. 370 - 2007-01-01 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 8456217023169753787
(Type A : Payroll deduction not allowed on Chapter 7 means test, even though they'd be allowed in Chapter 13 )

401(k) repayment allowed in Chapter 7 means test

� In re Lenton

Bankr.E.D.Pa. - 358 B.R. 651 - 2006-12-15 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 3268162753745361174
(Type B A : )

� In re Haley

Bankr.D.N.H. - 354 B.R. 340 - 2006-10-18 - 13 , Above

Google ID#: 14239442210459214439
(Type : )

full payment can be deducted on Form 22C

� In re Barraza

Bankr.N.D.Tex. - 346 B.R. 724 - 2006-08-01 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 4943287364388016952
(Type A : Payroll deduction not allowed on Chapter 7 means test, even though they'd be allowed in Chapter 13 )

� In re Eagan

Bankr. E.D PA - 458 B.R. 836 - 2011-08-30 - 13 ,

Google ID#: 5843105455816483743
(Type E : )

Chapter 13 plan payments do not have to increase once 401Kk) loan is paid off. Here, debtors were allowed to increase 401Kk) contributions once the loan was paid off so there would be no net change in Chapter 13 payments. Court said that was OK under section 541(b)(7), Judge noted that form 22C and section 541(b)(7) excludes plan payments from a debor's projected disposable income.

� In re Harrison

M.D.N.C - Case No. 09-51072 - 2010-01-25 - 7 ,

Google ID#: 10819978508425423191
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

No Chapter 7 means test deduction for retirement loan repayment

� In re Phillips

S.D. Ohio - 417 B.R. 30 - 2009-09-22 - 7 , Above

Google ID#: 17197251073868773270
(Type D : Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors relevant to "totality of circumstances" )

� Egebjerg v. Anderson (U.S. Trustee) (In re Egebjerg)

9th Cir. - 574 F.3d 1045 - 2009-08-24 - ,

Google ID#: 7299850787958061596
(Type E : )

Repayments of 401(k) loans are not deducted when calculating a debtor's disposable income.

� Egebjerg v. Anderson (In re Egebjerg)

9th Cir. - 574 F.3d 1045 - 2009-08-03 - 7 ,

Google ID#: 15249378171152015010
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

� Nowlin v. Peake (Matter of Nowlin)

5th Cir. - 576 F.3d 258 - 2009-07-17 - 13 , Above

Google ID#: 3377077295689169928
(Type : )

Only "actual" amount of payments to be made over plan period can be deducted; court can require increased payments when loan is repaid

� In re Salerno

Bankr.D.Colorado - 408 B.R. 558 - 2009-06-25 - 7 , NA

Google ID#: 3855918633145811105
(Type D : Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors relevant to "totality of circumstances" )

� Bolen v. Adams

N.D.Mississippi - 403 B.R. 396 - 2009-03-06 - 7 , Above

Google ID#: 18156836191608014424
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

� In re Christiansen

Bankr. M.D.N.C. - Case No. 08-50871 - 2009-01-21 - 7 ,

Google ID#: 5511081501211244408
(Type E : )

Debtor filed for Chapter 7 relief, but the court held that he could repay all of his unsecured debt under a 60 month Chapter 13 plan instead (by ceasing his contributions to his 401(k) retirement account).

� In re Mravik

Bankr. E.D. Wis. - 399 B.R. 202 - 2008-12-31 - 7 , Above

Google ID#: 9601931560099652766
(Type D : Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors relevant to "totality of circumstances" )

� In re Lipford

Bankr. M.D. N.C. - 397 BR 320 - 2008-10-17 - 13 , Above

Google ID#: 4506345063134156975
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

� In re Lasowski

BAP 8th Cir. - 384 BR 205 - 2008-03-31 - 13 , Above

Google ID#: 271615358476855156
(Type : )

only actual amount of plan payments to be made over plan period may be deducted.

� In re Mowris

Bankr.W.D. Missouri - 384 BR 235 - 2008-03-17 - 7 , Above

Google ID#: 5774741274676227177
(Type A : Payroll deduction not allowed on Chapter 7 means test, even though they'd be allowed in Chapter 13 )

� In re Felske

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - 385 B.R. 649 - 2008-02-06 - 7 ,

Google ID#: 9788658839424903022
(Type B : Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors is not a "special circumstance" for Chapter 7 determination )

� In re Mordis

Bankr.E.D.Mo. - 2007 WL 2962903 - 2007-10-09 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 271615358476855156
(Type A : Payroll deduction not allowed on Chapter 7 means test, even though they'd be allowed in Chapter 13 )

� In re Lewis

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - Case No. 07-32371 - 2007-09-17 - 7 , Above

Google ID#:
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

� In re Whitaker

Bankr.N.D.Ohio - 2007 WL 2156397 - 2007-07-25 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#:
(Type A : Payroll deduction not allowed on Chapter 7 means test, even though they'd be allowed in Chapter 13 )

� Eisen v. Thompson

N.D.Ohio - 370 B.R. 762 - 2007-06-29 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 8320374732301834089
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

� In re Johns

Bankr.E.D.Okla. - 342 B.R. 626 - 2007-05-26 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 16666959044257069897
(Type B : Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors is not a "special circumstance" for Chapter 7 determination )

� In re Skvorecz

Bankr.D.Colo. - 369 B.R. 638 - 2007-05-11 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 341173194400983342
(Type D : Fact that payroll deduction for 401(k) loan repayment in Chapter 13 would result in $0 for unsecured creditors relevant to "totality of circumstances" )

Court can refuse motion to dismiss Chapter 7 despite abuse presumption to avoid "absurd result" where credtiors would get $0 under Chapter 13 because of 401k loan repayment.

� McVay v. Otero

W.D.Tex. - 371 B.R. 190 - 2007-04-26 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 13235503489676277826
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

401(k) loan repayments are neither debt nor secured debt and, therefore, are not an allowed expense deduction on Form 22A.

� In re Zaporski

Bankr.E.D.Mich. - 366 B.R. 758 - 2007-04-17 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 3225070862768722755
(Type C : 401(k) loans are not "debts" or "secured debts", therefore cannot be claimed as such on Chapter 7 means test )

ability to pay off 401(k) loan is an indicator of 707(b)(3) abuse in light of "totality of circumstances" even though congress granted them extra protection under BAPCPA. Although excludable in Chapter 13, can still be relevant to a "totality of circumstances" abuse finding in Chapter 7

� In re Turner

Bankr.D.N.H. - 376 B.R. 370 - 2007-01-01 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 8456217023169753787
(Type A : Payroll deduction not allowed on Chapter 7 means test, even though they'd be allowed in Chapter 13 )

401(k) repayment allowed in Chapter 7 means test

� In re Lenton

Bankr.E.D.Pa. - 358 B.R. 651 - 2006-12-15 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 3268162753745361174
(Type B A : )

� In re Haley

Bankr.D.N.H. - 354 B.R. 340 - 2006-10-18 - 13 , Above

Google ID#: 14239442210459214439
(Type : )

full payment can be deducted on Form 22C

� In re Barraza

Bankr.N.D.Tex. - 346 B.R. 724 - 2006-08-01 - 7 , N/A

Google ID#: 4943287364388016952
(Type A : Payroll deduction not allowed on Chapter 7 means test, even though they'd be allowed in Chapter 13 )

All Cases A to Z

  • Bolen v. Adams, 403 B.R. 396 , (N.D.Mississippi ) 2009-03-06, #18156836191608014424
  • Egebjerg v. Anderson (In re Egebjerg), 574 F.3d 1045 , (9th Cir. ) 2009-08-03, #15249378171152015010
  • Egebjerg v. Anderson (U.S. Trustee) (In re Egebjerg), 574 F.3d 1045 , (9th Cir. ) 2009-08-24, #7299850787958061596
  • Eisen v. Thompson, 370 B.R. 762 , (N.D.Ohio ) 2007-06-29, #8320374732301834089
  • In re Barraza, 346 B.R. 724 , (Bankr.N.D.Tex. ) 2006-08-01, #4943287364388016952
  • In re Christiansen, Case No. 08-50871 , (Bankr. M.D.N.C. ) 2009-01-21, #5511081501211244408
  • In re Eagan, 458 B.R. 836 , (Bankr. E.D PA ) 2011-08-30, #5843105455816483743
  • In re Felske, 385 B.R. 649 , (Bankr.N.D.Ohio ) 2008-02-06, #9788658839424903022
  • In re Haley, 354 B.R. 340 , (Bankr.D.N.H. ) 2006-10-18, #14239442210459214439
  • In re Harrison, Case No. 09-51072 , (M.D.N.C ) 2010-01-25, #10819978508425423191
  • In re Johns, 342 B.R. 626 , (Bankr.E.D.Okla. ) 2007-05-26, #16666959044257069897
  • In re Lasowski, 384 BR 205 , (BAP 8th Cir. ) 2008-03-31, #271615358476855156
  • In re Lenton, 358 B.R. 651 , (Bankr.E.D.Pa. ) 2006-12-15, #3268162753745361174
  • In re Lewis, Case No. 07-32371 , (Bankr.N.D.Ohio ) 2007-09-17, #
  • In re Lipford, 397 BR 320 , (Bankr. M.D. N.C. ) 2008-10-17, #4506345063134156975
  • In re Mordis, 2007 WL 2962903 , (Bankr.E.D.Mo. ) 2007-10-09, #271615358476855156
  • In re Mowris, 384 BR 235 , (Bankr.W.D. Missouri ) 2008-03-17, #5774741274676227177
  • In re Mravik, 399 B.R. 202 , (Bankr. E.D. Wis. ) 2008-12-31, #9601931560099652766
  • In re Phillips, 417 B.R. 30 , (S.D. Ohio ) 2009-09-22, #17197251073868773270
  • In re Salerno, 408 B.R. 558 , (Bankr.D.Colorado ) 2009-06-25, #3855918633145811105
  • In re Skvorecz, 369 B.R. 638 , (Bankr.D.Colo. ) 2007-05-11, #341173194400983342
  • In re Turner, 376 B.R. 370 , (Bankr.D.N.H. ) 2007-01-01, #8456217023169753787
  • In re Whitaker, 2007 WL 2156397 , (Bankr.N.D.Ohio ) 2007-07-25, #
  • In re Zaporski, 366 B.R. 758 , (Bankr.E.D.Mich. ) 2007-04-17, #3225070862768722755
  • McVay v. Otero, 371 B.R. 190 , (W.D.Tex. ) 2007-04-26, #13235503489676277826
  • Nowlin v. Peake (Matter of Nowlin), 576 F.3d 258 , (5th Cir. ) 2009-07-17, #3377077295689169928

FAQ/Help:

How to use case law (it can be tricky)

If you're not familiar with what "case law" is, and how to use it, check out Chapter 7 of Nolo's LegalResearch: How to Find and Understand the Law for a guide to how to read through a case to get the parts that matter.

Also, you need to be familiar with the concept of "jurisdiction." Here are some helpful links:

When you read a case, check to make sure that the case's decision applies to your local district. Do this by looking at which court has decided the case -- either the U.S. Supreme Court, a court of appeal (listed here in large type), or a district court (listed in small type).  Your local district court judge is not bound to follow the opinion of judges from other district courts, but often they look to these cases for advice. Your local district, however, is bound  to follow decisions in cases from it governing circuit court. You'll see fairly few Supreme Court case here, but those cases are also binding on all districts."

Are these all the bankruptcy cases there are?

NO! NO! NO! This is a start for your research. New cases are constantly being decided. I update this when I have time. This is only a fraction of the actual published opinions out there. Dozens of cases are handed down nationwide every week. I catalog interesting ones when I have time. They are meant to serve as a starting point for your research -- NOT as a comprehensive listing of the current state of the law.

 

DISCLAIMER. By using this database you acknowledge and agree to the following:

This database does not contain every relevant case in every district on the topics covered; there are high priced services for that. This is free. It is offered to the public "as is" as an adjunct to the Nolo books, How to File Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: Keep Your Property and Repay Your Debts Over Time (10th Edition, 2010): which I co-author with attorney Stephen Elias.

This database is updated as time permits. Do not assume that it has the latest case in your district. We are still filling holes in the database -- and will always be. Use it as a place to start your reasearch, rather than the final answer to your question.

Some of these issues involve the discretion of the judge which can vary from judge to judge. So, even if you find a case just like yours where a judge went your way, as they say in the car biz, "your mileage may vary..."

If you're not familiar with what "case law" is, and how to use it, check out Chapter 7 of Nolo's LegalResearch: How to Find and Understand the Law for a guide to how to read through a case to get the parts that matter.

For more help, click the "?" tab.